Laboratory for Chemical Crystallography, University of Basel
Structure determination by single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments is a
powerful tool to get three-dimensional information on chemical compounds. This
text gives a overview of this method and tries to give comprehensive answers to
the following questions. It is some kind of faq for this analytical method.
Many settings described here correspond to the local conditions of the X-ray
lab of the University of Basel and may be different in other laboratories.
This list covers some topics of this fascinating analytical tool, but it is not
complete by far. It will be extended as new questions of general interest will
arise.
Can you give a short summary of a structure determination experiment?
A crystal of the compound under investigation is
stuck with glue on a glass fibre and mounted on the
diffractometer. In our case it is equipped with a
ccd area detector. After the determination of the
unit cell parameters a data collection strategy is established in order to
collect efficiently the required amount of data. The collected images are
integrated in order to extract the reflection data.
Structure solution is performed using direct
methodes. After successful solution of the structure
refinement is carried out until the difference between the experimental
data and the structure factors derived from the molecular model is small
enough to be considered satisfactory. back to top
Why do we need X-rays?
A common and well known tool to look at small objects is the microscope. We use
light which is scattered by the object we want to look at and collected again
using lenses. This method gives us a magnified image of the object under
examination. The limit of this kind of experiment is intrinsic to the nature of
the used electromagnetic radiation. It is the wavelength of the light, we
cannot look at objects smaller than the wavelenght of light which is about
10 -6 m. As X-rays have a wavelength of about 10 -10 m
they are suited to look at objects in that order of magnitude. back to top
Why do we need single crystals?
Using a normal microscope we examine one object at a time. In principle this
would also be possible with X-rays. Our problem is that we cannot handle such
small objects as molecules one by one. Moreover the physical events caused by
the scattered X-rays on some detector would be too weak to be visible besides
the noise of the electronics and other sources of errors. Crystals being
ordered arrangements of molecules in all three dimensions of space provide us
the possibility to overcome that problem. As all molecules of a crystal are
oriented the same way the events caused by the scattering experiment get
superimposed and we can measure them. One single event we can measure like
this is called reflection. The typical experiment consists of 3000 to 10000
independent reflections. back to top
What can we "see" carrying out such a structure determination?
The incident beam consists of electrons produced by the X-ray tube flying
through our sample. They interact with the electrons of the atoms in our
single crystal and are scattered. Therefore we "see" the electron density
present around the atoms, not the atom nucleus. If we want to "see" the
nucleus of the atoms, we must carry out neutron diffraction experiments which
are accessible only using beamlines on synchrotrons. back to top
What equipment is needed and how does the experimental setting look like?
The instrument used to carry out X-ray diffraction experiments is called
goniometer. There are three main parts. On one end we have the equipment
which produces the radiation. This may be a simple X-ray tube or similar
device. Then we have the place where to put the crystal. This part is made in
a way to permit to orient the crystal in any desired direction. As third part
of the instrument we have the detector. We use a ccd detector permitting to
collect many reflections in one go. The output of such a detector is a image
showing spots where the scattered X-ray beams have hit the detector. These
images are called frames. back to top
What is the difference between a serial diffractometer and a area detector?
In the early stages of crystallography cameras equipped with ordinary films
were used to take pictures of diffraction patterns produced by crystals
exposed to X-rays. In later stages diffractometers were developped which
were able to position the crystals in reflection position for all reflections
one by one and measure the intensity for these reflections one after the
other. They were called serial diffractometers and had the advantage to
produce much more accurate data. The area detector of today combines the
advantages of both: very accurate data, fully redundant datasets and no
chemicals and films. back to top
How do we mount the crystal on the diffractometer?
Usually the crystal is stuck with glue on a glassfibre. The choice of the glue
depends on variouns factors, mainly the interaction of the crystal with the
glue or the time to get dry. Sometimes crystals are put into glass capillaries.
This may be needed if the substance under investigation is air sensitive.
When we do low temperature work the crystal can be frozen to the glass fibre
using a protective oil. Sometimes this is referred to as the "oil drop method". back to top
How are images transformed to intensity data?
We can determine the orientation of the scattering planes of electron density.
From there we can calculate the size of the main building block of the crystal.
We call it unit cell. Once we know the unit cell we can calculate all
reflections we should be able to observe. Special software is used to go
through all the frames and to sum up all the intensity belonging to every
single reflection. We use a software package called EvalCCD for this purpose. back to top
What can actually be measured?
We can measure the intensity of the diffracted X-rays. But we do not know how
the different components as parallel planes may scatter in or out of phase.
This is referred to as the phase problem. back to top
If the phases cannot be measured, where do we get them from?
The phase information tells us where the scattering planes are localized in the
unit cell. Patterson found in 1934 that a modification of the equation
describing the scattering process lead to the elimination of the phase term,
thus to the loss of the information, where the electrons were localized. On
the other hand he got distance information from which - knowing the symmetry
that produced it - lead again to coordinates which could be used as a first
rough structure model. This method, sometimes referred to as heavy atom method,
has been almost completely forgotten as direct methodes trying to find valid
estimates for the phases using statistics have become so reliable that they
are widely accepted for all types of structures. In 1985, Herbert A.
Hauptmann and Jerome Karle got the
Nobel Prize in
Chemistry fort their efforts to establish direct methods as a structure
solution method, but of course the contributions by others should never be
forgotten even if the space here does not permit to put all their names. back to top
Why does a structure need to be refined once it is solved?
The first model derived from patterson vectors or from direct methods is very
rough and is in most cases incomplete. We can calculate how the reflections
would look like if our structural model would be present in the diffraction
experiment. In the ideal case our model would produce exactly the same
intensities as we have measured. In order to come as near as possible to this
aim we use a iterative process to complete and optimize our model comparing
the calculated structure factors (Fc) to the observed ones (Fo). In the end
the difference between them should become zero. In real life this is never
achieved. This difference or residual is a measure of what part of our
observations cannot be explained by the model and should therefore be as
low as possible, preferrably lower than 7%. It is called R-value. back to top
What is the final result of a structure determination?
We get electron density maxima and their position in the unit cell. Period.
Everything else is derived from this information. We can for instance
calculate chemically sensible interatomic distances using the properties of
the assigned atom types and we can draw a bond in a graphics program. But we
must keep in mind that this bond does not come out of the structure
determination and depends on our interpretation of the electron density map. back to top
What is "disorder" and why should we know something about?
In theory all molecules in a crystal lattice are oriented exactly the same way.
Nevertheless it is possible that slight differences are observed as there may
be enough space in the lattice to permit parts of our molecule to be in
different orientation at different places in the crystal. As we see the sum
of all molecules together we may see electron density features not explainable
with a single model. We speak of disorder in this case. Disorder can be
resolved using superimposed models with partial occupancy. It is important
to note that cooling down the sample may help to understand the disorder
problem but will never make it disappear. back to top
What other special cases may turn up?
When we encounter problems there may be many reasons. A possible and quite
frequent reason is that we did not measure a single crystal, but a twin, thus
a combination of more than one lattices. It is not always visible from the
shape of the crystal if it is twinned or not. Moreover there are structures
requiring more that three dimensions to describe correctly the way they are
built up. They are sometimes called modulated structures. back to top
Is it always possible to solve a structure?
The answer is simple: No. As the software available to solve structures is
constantly improving the number of these structures gets less. But as we get
only electron density maxima it happens also that structures are solved, but
the people doing the work do not recognize the structure in the solution
presented by the programs. In the meantime there is a lot of help from
graphical user interfaces, but the number of structures not solved will
probably never go down to zero. back to top
What software exists to work on X-ray structures?
We use SIR92 and SIR97
by Carmelo Giacovazzo et al., University of Bari, to solve structures. We
refine them using CRYSTALS,
a refinement package mainly written by David Watkin and issued by the
Crystallography lab of the University of Oxford.
Molecular graphics are done usually using
Ortep3 forWindows,
originally written by Michael N. Burnett and Carroll K. Johnson and issued by the
Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Louis Farrugia's GUI to Ortep3 makes it a easy to use program even if the core code
is more that 30 years old!
Another nice piece of software is Platon,
a collection of crystallographic tools which also includes a graphics part. This program
is mainly suited for advanced users.
Of course there exist many other software packages, as the
SHELX-suite by George
Sheldrick, University of Goettingen, and lots of graphics programs able to
deal with coordinates from X-ray structure determinations. A list of software
written in this field is available from the website of the International
Union of Crystallography at www.iucr.org.